The biggest problem I've found with the docs for XML::LibXML is that I have to keep in mind the @ISA hierarchy, and remember that a Document @ISA Node, for example. But I've never actually found the docs lacking any essential information that I couldn't quickly test to confirm.
IMHO, that's a problem with the DOM specification, not LibXML itself. Too much junk in there trying to be language-agnostic. And yet you still can't get a BF implementation . . .
"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.
In reply to Re^2: XML::LibXML seems to be under-documented
by hardburn
in thread XML::LibXML seems to be under-documented
by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |