It does. Maybe I'm missing something but just now it seems that the author is using callbacks for no good reason.

Whats even worse is that the module was released 03 Oct 1999, its tests (or instalation) fails in 8 of 10 CPAN Testers' attempts and the request tracker contains unapplied patches as old as Mar 12 2002. There are actually four bugs in RT, all in state "new". Looks like an abandoned module to me.

Maybe you'd have more luck with Net::IMAP::Simple or IMAP::Client. I've never used either of those, but they seem to be in a better shape. They pass their tests, have less reported bugs and the bugs are not as old. (The Net::IMAP::Simple is NOT based on Net::IMAP!)


In reply to Re^4: Why callbacks? by Jenda
in thread Why callbacks? by pileofrogs

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.