While chaining is neato and all, I can't think of a good reason to support this use.

I can. Lots. There's many a time you can't stuff everything into a constructor, and then live with the object ever after. Sometimes you have to twiddle the object repeatedly during the life of the program. In that context, method chaining usually results in more compact, clearer code.

Take a look at this review of HTML::CalendarMonth, which is an example of where I think chained methods would be a big win.

• another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl

In reply to Re^2: Method Chaining and Accessors by grinder
in thread Method Chaining and Accessors by linenoise

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.