Okay, 20 minutes later and I have a version of rsync that seems to run, so I switched into a directory where I'd like the sources put and typed the advised command:

c:\Perl\src>rsync -avz rsync://public.activestate.com/perl-current/ receiving file list ... done drwxr-xr-x 6592 2007/04/12 16:55:20 . -rw-r--r-- 6 2007/04/12 16:55:20 .patch -r--r--r-- 31992 2007/03/20 16:06:44 AUTHORS -r--r--r-- 6111 2006/06/13 20:28:51 Artistic -r--r--r-- 3776973 2007/02/27 13:20:45 Changes ... -r--r--r-- 1363 2006/06/13 20:29:38 x2p/str.h -r--r--r-- 3637 2006/06/13 20:29:38 x2p/util.c -r--r--r-- 944 2006/06/13 20:29:38 x2p/util.h -r--r--r-- 48960 2006/06/13 20:29:38 x2p/walk.c sent 99 bytes received 86198 bytes 232.29 bytes/sec total size is 62055224 speedup is 719.09

Result. A 10 minute wait and exactly nothing transferred!

Of course you say. If you don't have a copy of bleed perl to be updated, then there is nothing to do?

Or maybe I'm using the wrong options?

Or...

Could I work out what I'm doing wrong (besides following the instructions slavishly)? Maybe, but if the desire is to encourage widespread partisipation in the smoking (Is that legal?) of bleed perl, then it would make sense to make it reasonably easy for people to do so. Without having to ask 20 questions and end up feeling foolish in the process. Because otherwise, those few (non-usual suspects) who decide they'd like to have a go, will stop before they get started.

From my perspective, I prefer a link to an archive file that I can download because wget knows how to resume a broken download without needing to go through an ever more laborious process of working out how far it got last time and what has changed in the meantime. A download of 15 MB can take me 2 or 3 days. Stuff changes. ISP drop connections. Each time it resumes, there is more stuff at this end to sync, and more likelyhood that stuff at the other has changed. wget doesn't have this problem.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

In reply to Re^7: 5.10 imminent? by BrowserUk
in thread 5.10 imminent? by BrowserUk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.