Release early and often is a good approach with CPAN modules. I notice that CPAN testers is showing one failing test (though cpantesters is not yet displaying the results). If I were you, I'd make fixing the failing test a priority for 0.02.
My first thoughts on the module documentation are that it's not clear when you would want to use it, and what the advantages are over HTML::TokeParser or HTML::TreeBuilder. If this is spelled out loud and clear in the description section, more people will be inclined to install and use your module.
What would be really good is a worked example. Use some real website that's out there, maybe one you are hosting yourself. Together with a tutorial pod file, this would go a long way to promoting use of your module.
--
wetware hacker
(Qualified NLP Practitioner and Hypnotherapist)
In reply to Re: RFC: HTML::ListScraper
by rinceWind
in thread RFC: HTML::ListScraper
by vbar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |