I think maybe we're misunderstanding each other somehow.
Yes, indeed we did. I'm inclined to say I misunderstood the intent that the Anonymous Monk was trying to put in effect.
To elaborate a bit: I thought he wanted to clear the hash element and have exists yield failure when applied to the peculiar hash element; thus all the explanatory fuss.
You did otherwise and were obviously right according to his follow-ups.
In reply to Re^4: Hash checking
by shigetsu
in thread Hash checking
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |