Good luck ... this is a tough nut to crack with any non-trivial set of data - the number of false positives is going to be high. Uncommon names will work well but the m. smiths of the world are not going to be happy campers.
In reply to Re^3: compare strings intuitively
by derby
in thread compare strings intuitively
by rsiedl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |