Thank you for the additional reference. Actually I'm not much concerned here with pragmatism, i.e. with how "to do it" coming close to the real thing (because discussion both here and in the linked thread show that this is possible in reasonably simple ways both under 5 and 6) as much as with "philosophy", i.e. the real thing itself, specifically the "tail without the animal": can it be a beast in and of itself in Perl 6?
In reply to Re^2: [Perl 6] Any provision for a "dereferencing object"?
by blazar
in thread [Perl 6] Any provision for a "dereferencing object"?
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |