I'm thinking that the performance issues you're seeing are, at least partly, the result of a less-than optimal design. Have you considered using something that removes the necessity of keeping several million records in memory, such as using a tied hash, a tied array, a tied file or a database?
emc
Any New York City or Connecticut area jobs? I'm currently unemployed.
There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness is the true method.
In reply to Re: Large Array Performance
by swampyankee
in thread Large Array Performance
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |