Array-based objects are faster than hash-based objects. You don't need to use a module to get array-based objects.
I see the POD claims that its hashed-based objects are still faster than conventional hash-based objects. I'd like to see the benchmark.
Given the amount of work this module is doing behind the covers, I would need to see the benchmark.
And shareable between threads, that's a really clever trick.
In reply to Re^3: Performance issues with subroutines/methods
by BrowserUk
in thread Performance issues with subroutines/methods
by ribasushi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |