That's what I tried to show. Sure it's better to define classes statically. But as I understood the OP, he wanted to do this on the fly
In reply to Re: Nested Classes
by Tyke
in thread Nested Classes
by dcorbin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |