So in the area of "just ftp your files and go", Perl isn't as widely represented (although MovableType and its variants are all Perl and a very big in the blogging world).
What you'll get in the Perl side of things is powerful, detailed, much-tested modules and frameworks, and you build your own application on them.
Last year I spent a lot of time fiddling about with Joomla and Drupal and Wordpress, hoping to adapt them for a site I created. They had many features, but most of them I didn't want, and the ones I did want were fiddly and complicated with hundreds of little files twenty levels of "include" deep, so I gave up on the world of "applications" and I wrote my own. I used DBD, CGI and HTML::Template. The files are small, the code separates display and programming completely, and the application does only what I need to and nothing more.
I would probably think about using CGI::Application or something next time, but still, I wouldn't get a PHP application and try to wrestle it into submission. I'd get the powerful tools I already know how to use and build up.
So even if there aren't many monolithic apps out there branded "Made With Perl", I bet there are thousands of smaller ones which quietly do exactly what their creators want.
Nobody says perl looks like line-noise any more
kids today don't know what line-noise IS ...
In reply to Re: Poster child applications?
by Cody Pendant
in thread Poster child applications?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |