Since this post here specifically mentions suitability for cryptographic purposes
Read again.
The only mention of 'cryptography' is the bland statement: " Cryptographically generated random numbers gather entropy to seed there generators." which is, by no reading that I can ascribe, the same as "suitability for cryptographic purposes".
And, it might serve your purpose better to read an entire thread before going off half cocked.
In reply to Re^3: A better rand() for Win32
by BrowserUk
in thread A better rand() for Win32
by bitshiftleft
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |