Perhaps if $VERSION isn't defined and then require fails, base.pm could search for any subroutines being defined in the requested package and, if there are some, produce a much more verbose message about how they now need to define $VERSION for the in-lined module to work with this fixed release of base.pm.A failed require can have created subs, so the check would have to have preceeded the require. I know it's a trivial added inefficiency, but it's just one more reason to hate using base just as syntactic sugar.
In reply to Re^3: How to get Perlmonks to report bugs? (ungrateful bozo)
by ysth
in thread How to get Perlmonks to report bugs?
by schwern
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |