Also you should keep in mind that Perl::Critic will complain about builtin function overwrites
It's "may complain" not "will complain". P::C is configurable in all things.
I love P::C, but changing code just to make a comment disappear isn't what it's about. It highlights things that may be problems. Change them if it makes your code better. If <code>$door->open</open> is more intention revealing than the alternatives leave it alone.
In reply to Re^2: is it ok to name object methods after core functions?
by adrianh
in thread is it ok to name object methods after core functions?
by leocharre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |