This allows me to figure out what needs to be done in multiple steps (maintainability) rather than try and shove it all in a single expression that is hard to extend or possibly decipher by someone else.
Cheers - L~R
In reply to Re: Dealing with undefined captures in a substitution
by Limbic~Region
in thread Dealing with undefined captures in a substitution
by grinder
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |