I have found a few steph_bow needs to weigh in on.
Agreed. That said, the test set provided is amazingly complete given how concise it is.
There is nothing accidental about either the choice of sample, or its ordering. A lot of thought went into its provision.
In reply to Re^3: searching for strings
by BrowserUk
in thread searching for strings
by steph_bow
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |