It is _not_ time to reject the idea that syntax affects maintainability. When you buy your language reference note how many ways there are of doing things; how many special cases; how many themes. Too many increases the chance that the other persons code is written with themes and idioms that the maintainer is not familiar with. How much does the community advocate machine generated code? Or elevate code obfuscation? They can lead to a culture of poorly written code being O.K. or even cool. Syntax and community have a lot of influence on maintainability of code! - Paddy.

In reply to Re^2: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion by paddy3118
in thread Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion by oyse

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.