If you don't mind the different order of the output then:
Sorry if I miss something, but your solution based on a hash, like all hash based ones seems aimed at uniqueness... but that doesn't seem a requirement as of the root node...
In reply to Re^2: Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...)
by blazar
in thread Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...)
by eyepopslikeamosquito
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |