1. While the "plong" link doesn't meet the criteria of explaining what the author meant by "You should set DefineEditText flag Multiline and/or WordWrap", I have to admit that it is the most helpful info I've encountered so far. However, the fact that the best example of anything even remotely helpful was a link to a script written by Teabag pretty much backs up my assertion that the module's own documentation is sorely lacking. Besides, what if Teabag had had the flu or something on that fine November day back in 2004 and didn't end up writing that script? Why, we'd all be living in Potterville now, that's what.
2. I think if you go back and re-read my original post, you'll find it breezy and not at all disrespectful. But maybe that depends on how one defines "respectful." Correctly pointing out the fact that there is something in a module that is referred to in passing but is neither documented nor demonstrated, really doesn't seem disrespectful to me. If it were MY module, I'd want to thank the person who pointed that out.
In any case, I put a fair amount of time, thought and effort into my original post, and a drive-by response posting a link to something completely irrelevant is actually kind of insulting, and I responded accordingly. But any reasonable person who carefully reads my original post would have to agree that there's not an ounce of disrespect in it. Because there isn't!
Anyhow, thanks for the plong link. Hopefully it yields something enlightening.
In reply to Re^4: help deciphering SWF::Builder docs
by Anonymous Monk
in thread help deciphering SWF::Builder docs
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |