My main problem with it is that there is no common way of creating shared/shareable, object oriented libraries.
Two questions to ponder:
If I told you that there is a simple mechanism that allows most form of perl OO to work as shared objects, without imposing the high cost of proxy object solutions, would you be interested?
Would it change your mind about the efficacy of threading in Perl 5?
Or would some other reason to dislike them come to the fore?
In reply to Re^5: Slow evolution of Perl = Perl is a closed Word (thread decade)
by BrowserUk
in thread Slow evolution of Perl = Perl is a closed Word
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |