Connections to mysql are fairly cheap on the client side, but can eat up a good chunk of memory server side (depending on lots of things that a good DBA could explain better than I can).
If the databases are on the same physical machine it'd probably be more efficient to combine them into one database. Of course as things grow you may hit a point where you have to split them up or it becomes more efficient to do so.
In reply to Re: Connecting to Multiple Databases vs A Single One
by cowboy
in thread Connecting to Multiple Databases vs A Single One
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |