There have been a couple of posts in the last few weeks that have used the <pre> tag instead of the <code> tag, with the result that a really long line of code or output isn't wrapped, making the main page of the site really w-i-d-e.
These super wide posts do get considered, and after a while the problem is addressed, but in the mean time, it bugs me. I admit that this is a pet peeve -- blame that on my background in newspaper production. A solution that suggests itself is to get rid of the <pre> tags that allow this kind of thing to happen. Is this tag necessary?
I think I'd rather have a chunk of code that's unreadable because it's rendered in a proportional font, than having something that looks fine, except that it's 200 characters wide and ruins the rest of the page.
Alternatively, can I suggest or gently urge the Janitors to act a little more quickly on the posts that require <code> tags in place of <pre>?
Another alternative is to move the hint If you think you're going to use <pre> tags — don't! .. so a spot above the list of approved tags -- although I don't know if that would work any better than the current solution.
Welcome, newcomer!
You're posting output or scripts?
We prefer code tags.
In reply to Those 'wide load' posts by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |