OP is checking for defined-ness solely to avoid generation of the warningCan I get the name of your crystal ball supplier?
I would guess that the warning made the OP stop and think what branch to take in the undef case, and that the OP's code has a good chance of reflecting what was actually wanted.
In reply to Re^4: complaint: always testing defined()
by ysth
in thread complaint: always testing defined()
by RaptorRex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |