I see absolutely no indication that the blog comments were copied from some other site so it makes no sense to me to search for that thread at PerlMonks.
But searching for "know for the rest" (with the delimiter changed from the default space) would not, for example, match "know for\nthe rest". So newlines or even an accidetal double space would thwart that search.
There is a date plainly visible on "your" reply and it is trivial to jump to your nodes around that date (super search likely is the easiest way to do that for somebody with a lot of write-ups) -- unless you think the thread was not only lifted w/o any indications of being a copy but was also lifted over the course of years and yet the dates recorded somehow don't correspond to the dates of the lifted notes. That strikes me as "magical thinking" for sure.
- tye
In reply to Re: Problem with Super Search? (whitespace)
by tye
in thread Problem with Super Search?
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |