Wasn't part of the reason that nobody was maintaining it was because it was meant to be a way to start a Perl script faster that turned out to be much slower? So even when you didn't run into a bug, it was slow enough to be of little value. If somebody wanted it as a way to hide source code, then the existence of B::Deparse likely makes it at least much less than foolproof.
So I thought it was an interesting idea that turned out to be rather useless and hard to maintain so it was no surprise that it wasn't maintained. But I only ever paid peripheral attention to it.
- tye
In reply to Re: What happened to perlcc? (useless?)
by tye
in thread What happened to perlcc?
by rgiskard
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |