[I think] you misunderstood [...] I was talking about reaping a node due to the author wanting it to be reaped
No, I didn't misunderstand. I preferred to focus on the author's (theorized) motivation since the source of the request matters very little; the reason for the request is what matters. And the theorized reason (that the question has been answered) seems quite inappropriate; it is certainly against site policy.
For more about why "I want my node reaped" is not a valid reason for reaping a node, see (tye)Re: why a nodelet can be kept against author wish?. Win did an admirable job of dealing with the situation, IMHO.
- tye
In reply to Re^4: Correlation using Statistics::LineFit -- (reap post?)
by tye
in thread Correlation using Statistics::LineFit -- DISREGARD POST
by Win
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |