Erm ... if the transformation in one direction is "normalization", then the transformation in the oposite direction is denormalization, isn't it? Or would that be too logical for Unicode. Isn't just one of the ways to encode the graphemes supposed to be the "normal form"?
In either case thanks both for uncovering an (what should I call it?!?) interesting feature of Unicode. I had no idea characters in Unicode can be not only multibyte, but also mutlicodepoint. I guess the commitee that invented Unicode was too big.
In reply to Re^2: [RFC] How to reverse a (text) string
by Jenda
in thread [RFC] How to reverse a (text) string
by moritz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |