DEF's author is stupid and has 30 deps. Should I avoid ABC because of that?I'd say yes, definitely - if you can afford it. Otherwise the submit to CPAN is questionable. ABC is likely to break (weakest link chain rule) because of DEF. Don't avoid ABC if you can convince its author to not use DEF, or if you can convince the author of DEF of the "less is more" principle. It is your module that's beholden (?) as unusable - even if the fault lies in DEF.
update: I'm checking your modules =~ /${'my aptitude'}/
--shmem
_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ /
/\_¯/(q /
---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
In reply to Re^4: Challenge: CPAN Golf
by shmem
in thread Challenge: CPAN Golf
by shmem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |