Might need to limit the search somewhat (eg, by date) -- when I tried the Modules example, I got:
Query was not run; Server is too busy ("explain" took 3.94 seconds).
Even if that's atypical, it does suggest that this might be expensive for a general solution. (Of course, this is still nicer than opening one at a time!)
In reply to Re^2: Timestamp for Reviews
by igelkott
in thread Timestamp for Reviews
by igelkott
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |