Hopefully, most people are using the bayes system in the spamassassin these days (or just gmail); so, hopefully your "newsletter" gets filtered properly anyway.
UPDATE: I'm sad that I used the word twice like that. I'm also sad that the state of email today means that a high percentage of legitimate mail is blocked in the effort to block spam. However, I do find it rather unlikely that a legitimate mailing would need to spend so much time tweaking the scores. If it does, then the spamassassin isn't doing the job it promised — so perhaps it is doint it's job.
-Paul
In reply to Re: spam content checker
by jettero
in thread spam content checker
by geetha
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |