I think you could subclass some of the TAP modules. Subclass:
Ugh. This sort of thing that can too easily happen with OO inheritance. When it does, I always ask myself, "where did I go wrong?".
I hope I am missing some key parameter or callback that could be passed to TAP::Harness or TAP::Parser to avoid all the extra subclassing.
TGI says moo
In reply to Re: Can Test::Harness treat sets of tests as files?
by TGI
in thread Can Test::Harness treat sets of tests as files?
by kyle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |