Which happens to be the reason both tye and I have relegated Ruby to the "Neat Toy" category. If the compiler can't be enlisted to help you catch typos, then your language design is seriously flawed. (That and how does a language by a Japanese hacker go through 3 versions before an American adds support for UTF-8??)
My criteria for good software:
Does it work?
Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?