If you want to avoid programming in your HTML files and you want HTML that can be previewed and editted in HTML tools then Petal is there already.
Your second point I agree with: Petal does maintain HTML that can be previewed and edited in HTML tools.
But I disagree with your first point. I think Petal allows for programming in HTML. Sure the syntax of the programming language looks a bit different, but it's still programming in my book. And in a previous post you literally said: "petal's loops" --- now since you said that Petal had loops and since loops are a programming construct, you can program in petal...
begin round two of fergal versus princepawn :) -- round one took place here
<span tal:condition="true:user/is_authenticated"> Yo, authenticated! </span>
[% IF user.is_authenticated %] Yo, authenticated! [% END %]
<div class="auth_dialog"> <span sid="authed"> Yo, authenticated! </span> <span sid="not_authed"> NOT authed </span> </div>
use html::auth_dialog; my $tree = html::auth_dialog->new; $tree->highlander (auth_dialog => [ authed => sub { $_[0]->authenticated } not_authed => sub { 1 } ], $model ); print $tree->as_HTML;
<tag tal:repeat="element_name EXPRESSION"> blah blah blah </tag>
[% FOREACH s IN EXPRESSION %] * [% s %] [% END %]
<div class="elemid"> blah blah blah </div>
my $li = $tree->look_down(class => 'elemid'); my @items = qw(bread butter vodka); $tree->iter($li => @items);
| I have beheld the tarball of 22.1 on ftp.gnu.org with my own eyes. How can you say that there is no God in the Church of Emacs? -- David Kastrup |
|
| Enforce strict model-view separation in template engines via HTML::Seamstress | The car is in the cdr, not the cdr in the car |
In reply to one does program in the HTML with Petal
by metaperl
in thread RFC - Template::Empty
by redhotpenguin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |