I simply doubt that you belief every thing in the world should be GPLed (or better could).I agree that not everything should be released under the GPL. My objection, in this case, is that the restrictive license ensures that I cannot fix any bugs or security holes. I doubt anyone would ever have heard of Perl or Linux if either had such a license, even for free.
In fact, I would probably go so far as to say that I don't want to work with any software product where I cannot be reasonably expected to fix it or have a serious bug fix quickly issued by the manufacturer. That being said, I seem to be stuck in the Windows world, so that puts the lie to my argument :)
Cheers,
Ovid
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to (Ovid) Re(2): Don't blindly recommend code
by Ovid
in thread Don't blindly recommend code
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |