Could you get away with the following?
{ my $shared_data; my $inner_sub; sub outer_sub { ... ... $inner_sub->(...) ... ... } $inner_sub = sub { ... $shared_data ... }; }
That would get rid of the bug. (A named sub inside another sub in Perl is a bug in my eyes. The warning is too gentle.)
Note that having any $shared_data makes the function non-reentrant, but you can eliminate that problem by sharing data via parameters.
Update: no warnings 'closure'; with a comment explaining that all shared variables need to be exchanged by parameters or globals would also do the trick. But you're eliminating a very useful check.
In reply to Re^5: nested routines, anonymous routines and location dependency
by ikegami
in thread nested routines, anonymous routines and location dependency
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |