Thanks for the update on the "map" update. Even with that in mind, I'm sure most programmers would agree that "for" is preferable when the return value is unused, since that usage is better understood, and you do not need to look around to verify that the context is indeed void.
"map", for me, immediately brings into question what is being done with the returned value.
"As you get older three things happen. The first is your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... " - Sir Norman Wisdom
In reply to Re^4: How a for() assignment works
by NetWallah
in thread How a for() assignment works
by Herkum
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |