I was taught the 'cost, quality, time - pick two' axiom.
I know it as "cheap, good, fast - pick any two", placing Cost as close as can be to the bottom, while not reaching "free", Time is also aiming for Now, but isn't there.
With these scales in mind, I believe the idea is that you should reach the "once it's not broken" stage, rather that "as close as can be to perfect".
Update: fast, not free, thanks Roy Johnson
Software speaks in tongues of man.
Stop saying 'script'. Stop saying 'line-noise'.
We have nothing to lose but our metaphors.
In reply to Re: The dangers of perfection, and why you should stick with good enough
by Erez
in thread The dangers of perfection, and why you should stick with good enough
by redhotpenguin
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |