"Push" seems like a poor name for this.Well, what name do you think is best?
I also wouldn't lump HTML::Seamstress and XMLC in with Template::Recall and StringTemplate. As you know, the former use an approach based on the HTML/XML document structure, while Template::Recall and CGI::FastTemplate do a much simpler regex-like substitutions.If you focus on _how_ they do their job, they are different. If you focus on the fact that they achieve what Terence Parr defined throughout his article, then Template::Recall and HTML::Seamstress are very similar.
And again, with both Recall and Seamstress, you must adhere to a certain discipline while with TT and others you can adhere if you please, but dont have to.
In reply to Re^2: Push style templating systems
by metaperl
in thread Push style templating systems
by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |