I was working on a response to File::Find::prune problems, when I saw grinder's response:
"If you're starting out with File::Find, then the best advice I can give you is... don't. It is old and bletcherous and there's no need to use it for new work."
So off I went to look at File::Find::Rule, which he'd suggested. And you know what? It is a really neat, and I'll probably be using it over File::Find from now on.
But I don't really want to talk about File::Find, I want to talk about CPAN. I'm always finding modules via PerlMonks that I like better than what I'm using (which I got via my own CPAN searching). Part of the reason for that is I tend to go with the first-fit rather than the best-fit. Why? Because my CPAN ritual is sort of a pain in the rear:
- Initial search, either by category or Kobe's search to find a candidate.
- Skim the documentation,
- Still looking good? Great, look through the reviews. Not a lot of reviews? No reviews? Okay, go check the bug tracker, and search on Perlmonks. Maybe CPAN testers, annocpan, and cpanforum too.
- Do I want to go back to step one? No, just install it.
So my question is, is there any better metric or search methodology that will get me quality/popluarity information about a module faster? How do you go about finding solutions on CPAN?
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.