I don't have to be a judge to state an opinion. This is a discussion site. If you don't like the negatives of your project discussed along with the positives, then you should not have suggested your project for consideration in the thread.
I'm not attacking anyone. I am stating my opinion that while your project may be of very high quality, there are certain downsides to it. That my disagreeing with you gets me all but openly accused of being a heroin addict and a code thief is, I would say, a very big check mark in your "cons" column.
"mischief", BTW, is a very common nickname and a very common portion of a nickname. It's a common English word with multiple different definitions and connotations depending on context. "Mr. Mischief" even happens to be a character in a very popular series of children's books. If you're going to smear everyone you come across using some form of "mischief" as a nickname online, be prepared to defend your remarks. You may even want to be prepared to defend those remarks in court if you're not careful.
For some balance, I'll say that my favorite CMS does not have the turnaround time on feature requests and non-security-related bug fixes I'd like to see. It's not in my favorite programming language, and there are some neat features other CMSes have that it wouldn't support very well do to the design philosophy. It also has enough positive features that it's still what I use.
If you want me to write a glowing review of your project on PerlMonks or elsewhere, you might pay more attention to your features and publicizing your feature list than hiding behind anonymous smear campaigns.
In reply to Re^7: What's the best Perl CMS?
by mr_mischief
in thread What's the best Perl CMS?
by cosmicperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |