True enough, but using fewer characters isn't necessarily faster (to type). There's four switches needed, whereas that p-r-i-n-t just rolls off the finger r-l-r-r-l and that tick dollar underscore equals dollar F has you bouncing up and down on the shift key. It just ain't as smooth.
Reflecting on this, the few vestiges of awk that remain are more in my fingers than in my head.
In reply to Re: Re: awk has its place
by grinder
in thread AWK and Perl on UNIX
by Zo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |