I think there is no such thing as a reference to a list1)
BrowserUK quoted the documentation that
\(@foo) returns a list of references. Assuming that
\(@foo) does, in fact, return a list (as stated by that documentation), then wouldn't
[\(@foo)] have to return a reference to that list ?
2) I find it amazing that the current implementation of
\(@foo) DWIMs for so many people. To me, it is blatantly obvious that DWIMness dictates that
\(@foo) ought to return the same as
[@foo]. (I know one other who shares the same view - but I have no doubt that we are in a minority.)
3) I should acknowledge that I don't really understand "lists" - and, having read numerous explanations, have grown to accept the fact that I probably never will.
Cheers,
Rob
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.