Yes, I have to admit I also occasionally had hand-hacked parsing for those one or two options. In the meantime, I've learned from those mistakes, i.e. I use Getopt::Long as soon as the first option idea pops up in my mind... because I know it won't be the last. Not only is it less work, it's also so much more flexible and DWIM.
On the other hand, I'd say it's never too late. And, as any option parsing is typically done in some central place anyway (rather than being scattered all over the program), replacing it with Getopt::Long has usually been a matter of less than five minutes — unless you postpone that decision until your tool has as many options as gcc...
In reply to Re: Use Getopt::Long even if you don't think you need to
by almut
in thread Use Getopt::Long even if you don't think you need to
by ysth
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |