10203485/s 6% 5% 1% --
Given that guess at number of iterations per second and those percentages, the main thing you can conclude from these benchmark results is "these are all so equivalent in performance that meaningful comparison of them is beyond the abilities of Benchmark". Any claims as to which is fastest are simply unfounded based on those results.
Update: And based on what you are trying to test, you should have questioned those results. I suspect you are missing some backslashes and have only tested how fast constant expressions can be run. &foo doesn't give you a reference to the foo subroutine.
- tye
In reply to Re: Performance issues using bind and eval in DB2 accesses (noise)
by tye
in thread Performance issues using bind and eval in DB2 accesses
by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |