I don't see Juerd thinking the two should be tied together in that thread (other than in his initial post not recognizing the possibility of <> being in use in an outer context).
That is what I meant. I didn't recognize it at a first glance, either. And I'm sure most people who are not Perl gurus would, and even some who are too.
I've localized @ARGV when calling Getopt::Long::GetOptions before. @ARGV's implicit use by <ARGV> is only a small part of what it does.
Good point but I beg to differ: @ARGV's implicit use by <ARGV> is certainly not the only thing it does, but perhaps the biggest part of it. Another one that springs to mind is shift and pop defaulting to it outside of a sub. But the fact Getopt::* modules use it does not constitute something "it does" since it doesn't belong to the sematics of the language, while those other things do!
In reply to Re^8: How 'bout an argv pragma?
by blazar
in thread How 'bout an argv pragma?
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |