Currently it's only an exported subroutine called prepend. Is that a good name?
I'm not a native English speaker, so my opinion might be a bit off, but... "prepend" sounds rather spatial to, like adding something at the begin of a string. I'd suggest precede instead, which sounds more temporal.
Last but not least: would you like to see this on CPAN?
Yes. And please describe the difference to the various Hook::* modules in the documentation ;-)
In reply to Re: RFC: Sub::Prepend - Prepend code to named subroutines
by moritz
in thread RFC: Sub::Prepend - Prepend code to named subroutines
by lodin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |