So really the problem is in the assumption that there is no side effect, wheras in fact there is. The side effect is that the variable is made present in a a new scope which prevents the object from being destroyed (and the destructor has side effects).
Hm, or does it. Since I'm not assigning it to a variable the refcount won't be being increased. But surely it can't be destroyed while it's still in scope - in a void context or not...
I'll test it out and report back.
In reply to Re^2: useless Useless warning
by aufflick
in thread useless Useless warning
by aufflick
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |