The problem is not so much the use of utf8 encoding for the script itself (it is possible to put "wide characters" in the script, along with use ut8;). Rather, it is the unnecessary and presumptuous inclusion of the initial byte order mark (BOM), which many people believe should not happen with utf8 encoded files, because byte order is never an issue for utf8 data.
In reply to Re^4: running scripts in Mac OS 10.4
by graff
in thread running scripts in Mac OS 10.4
by rogerd
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |