First, I'm going to disagree with the anonymonk - it's not spam. It's entirely on-topic. If you don't want to read perl-related news, find another website.
Second, what I'm used to seeing with new modules in existing spaces is a pro/con list. Can you compare your module to other XML parsing modules that already exist? In my case, I mostly want to know how it stacks up against XML::Twig, but comparisons with others are useful, too (XML::Simple, XML::Writer, just off the top of my head).
Consider users that may be evaluating XML modules to use for their project as well as users that may already be using an XML module - why should they switch (or should they switch)?
I must admit, there's nothing here that would make me give up XML::Twig - convince me. By doing a comparison. And if you give XML::Twig no "pros", I'm going to be very suspicious.
In reply to Re: RFC: XML::Pastor v0.52 is released - A REVOLUTIONARY way to deal with XML
by Tanktalus
in thread RFC: XML::Pastor v0.52 is released - A revolutionary way to deal with XML
by aulusoy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |